2018考研英语阅读模拟题(5)
发布时间:2017-04-12文章来源:编辑:Smile
阅读量:524

When you think of the tremendous technological progress we have made, it’s amazing how little we have developed in other respects. We may speak contemptuously of the poor old Romans because they relished the orgies of slaughter that went on in their arenas. We may despise them because they mistook these goings on for entertainment. We may forgive them condescendingly because they lived 2000 years ago and obviously knew no better. But are our feelings of superiority really justified? Are we any less blood-thirsty? Why do boxing matches, for instance, attract such universal interest? Don’t the spectators who attend them hope they will see some violence? Human beings remains as bloodthirsty as ever they were. The only difference between ourselves and the Romans is that while they were honest enough to admit that they enjoyed watching hungey lions tearing people apart and eating them alive, we find all sorts of sophisticated arguments to defend sports which should have been banned long age; sports which are quite as barbarous as, say, public hangings or bearbaiting.
It really is incredible that in this day and age we should still allow hunting or bull-fighting, that we should be prepared to sit back and watch two men batter each other to pulp in a boxing ring, that we should be relatively unmoved by the sight of one or a number of racing cars crashing and bursting into flames. Let us not deceive ourselves. Any talk of ‘the sporting spirit’ is sheer hypocrisy. People take part in violent sports because of the high rewards they bring. Spectators are willing to pay vast sums of money to see violence. A world heavyweight championship match, for instance, is front page news. Millions of people are disappointed if a big fight is over in two rounds instead of fifteen. They feel disappointment because they have been deprived of the exquisite pleasure of witnessing prolonged torture and violence.
Why should we ban violent sports if people enjoy them so much? You may well ask. The answer is simple: they are uncivilized. For centuries man has been trying to improve himself spiritually and emotionally - admittedly with little success. But at least we no longer tolerate the sight madmen cooped up in cages, or public floggings of any of the countless other barbaric practices which were common in the past. Prisons are no longer the grim forbidding places they used to be. Social welfare systems are in operation in many parts of the world. Big efforts are being made to distribute wealth fairly. These changes have come about not because human beings have suddenly and unaccountably improved, but because positive steps were taken to change the law. The law is the biggest instrument of social change that we have and it may exert great civilizing influence. If we banned dangerous and violent sports, we would be moving one step further to improving mankind. We would recognize that violence is degrading and unworthy of human beings.

21. It can be inferred from the passage that the author’s opinion of nowadays’ human beings is
  A. not very high. B. high.
  C. contemptuous. D. critical.

22. The main idea of this passage is
  A. vicious and dangerous sports should be banned by law.
  B. people are willing to pay vast sums money to see violence.
  C. to compare two different attitudes towards dangerous sports.
  D. people are bloodthirsty in sports.

23. That the author mentions the old Romans is
  A. To compare the old Romans with today’s people.
  B. to give an example.
  C. to show human beings in the past know nothing better.
  D. to indicate human beings are used to bloodthirsty.

24. How many dangerous sports does the author mention in this passage?
  A. Three. B. Five.
  C. Six. D. Seven.

25. The purpose of the author in writing this passage is
  A. that, by banning the violent sports, we human beings can improve our selves.
  B. that, by banning the dangerous sports, we can improve the law.
  C. that we must take positive steps to improve social welfare system.
  D. to show law is the main instrument of social change.
  
参考答案:A A D B A

热门评论(0)
登录后参与评论
相关文章
  • 考研总成绩究竟怎么算?
    发布时间:2017-04-27文章来源:阅读量:2929
    初试成绩好的同学,充分准备可以加大自己的优势;初试成绩不是很理想的考生,如果积极准备复试,最后翻盘的机会也很大。
  • 华东理工化学工程2017年专业学位硕士招生目录
    发布时间:2017-04-25文章来源:阅读量:955
    华东理工化学工程2017年专业学位硕士招生目录,详情如下所示。
  • 华东理工大学化工学院2017年复试线
    发布时间:2017-04-25文章来源:阅读量:1220
    根据化工学院实际情况,特制定化工学院复试录取工作办法,2017年化工学院各专业复试分数线及招生名额如下。
  • 清华大学化学工程系导师朱兵简介
    发布时间:2017-04-21文章来源:阅读量:992
    朱兵博士现任清华大学循环经济研究院常务副院长、清华大学化工系生态工业研究中心教授,兼任国际应用系统分析研究所(IIASA,维也纳)能源项目客座研究员(Guest Research Scholar)。
  • 2018考研英语阅读模拟题(6)
    发布时间:2017-04-21文章来源:阅读量:2852
    考研英语的复习,除了要看知识点,做题也是很关键的。小编整理了2018考研英语阅读模拟题,希望能帮助到考研的同学。